Revisiting the Healthy Migrant Paradox in Perinatal Health Outcomes Through a Scoping Review in a Recent Host Country

J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Feb;19(1):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s10903-015-0317-7.

Abstract

Ample evidence shows that, in many developed countries, immigrants have similar or better perinatal health outcomes than natives despite facing socioeconomic disadvantages in the host country ("healthy migrant paradox" -HMP). This scoping review aims to: (1) summarize the literature on perinatal health among immigrants and natives in Spain and (2) examine whether there is evidence of the HMP in a context of recent migration. A total of 25 articles published between 1998 and 2014 were reviewed. Overall, we found evidence of the HMP in low birthweight and to a lesser extent in preterm, though the patterns vary by origin, but not in macrosomia and post-term. The results are consistent across settings, levels of adjustment, and birth year. Policies should be oriented towards identifying the modifiable risk factors leading to a higher risk of macrosomia and post-term among immigrants.

Keywords: Birthweight; Gestational age; Immigrants; Perinatal health; Spain.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Emigrants and Immigrants / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Fetal Macrosomia / ethnology
  • Humans
  • Infant Health / ethnology*
  • Infant, Low Birth Weight
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Outcome / ethnology*
  • Premature Birth / ethnology
  • Risk Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Spain / epidemiology