Nuclear grade plus proliferation grading system for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: validation in a tertiary referral hospital cohort

Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Dec;144(6):837-43. doi: 10.1309/AJCPVH6FED2ZATUP.

Abstract

Objectives: For patients with invasive breast cancer, management decisions are informed by tumor grade according to the Nottingham Grading System (NGS), either on its own or as part of the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). A system retaining the nuclear grade element but substituting the two subjective components, mitosis count and tubule formation, of the NGS with a proliferation index based on Ki-67 (MIB-1) has been proposed (nuclear grade plus proliferation [N+P] grading).

Methods: We validated the prognostic value of this grading system on a population of 322 women.

Results: N+P grading resulted in more grade I tumors (47.9% vs 4.5%) and fewer grade II (32% vs 51.5%) and grade III (20.1% vs 44%) tumors compared with NGS. The NPI calculated based on N+P grade had a similar association with survival (P < .001; odds ratio, 1.729) as the NPI calculated on the basis of the NGS grade (P < .001; odds ratio, 1.668).

Conclusions: The N+P system seems equivalent to the NGS system.

Keywords: Automation; Invasive breast carcinoma grading; MIB-1 (Ki-67) immunohistochemistry; Nottingham Prognostic Index; Survival.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / pathology*
  • Cell Proliferation
  • Cohort Studies
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Grading / methods*
  • Prognosis
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tertiary Care Centers