Comparison of Six Automated Treponema-Specific Antibody Assays

J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Jan;54(1):163-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02593-15. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

Abstract

Six different Treponema (TP)-specific immunoassays were compared to the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test. A total of 615 samples were tested. The overall percent agreement, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity of each assay compared to the FTA-ABS test were as follows: Architect Syphilis TP, 99.2%, 96.8%, and 100%; Cobas Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; ADVIA Centaur Syphilis, 99.8%, 99.4%, and 100%; HISCL Anti-TP assay kit, 99.7%, 98.7%, and 100%; Immunoticles Auto3 TP, 99.0%, 97.5%, and 99.6%; Mediace TPLA, 98.0%, 98.1%, and 98.0%. All results that were discrepant between the TP-specific assays were associated with samples from noninfectious cases (11 immunoassay false positives and 7 from previous syphilis cases). Our study demonstrated that TP-specific immunoassays generally showed high sensitivities, specificities, and percentages of agreement compared to FTA-ABS, with rare cases of false-positive or false-negative results. Therefore, most TP-specific immunoassays are acceptable for use in screening for syphilis. However, it is important to perform a thorough review of a patient's clinical and treatment history for interpreting the results of syphilis serology.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Bacterial / analysis*
  • Automation, Laboratory / methods*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / methods*
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods*
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Syphilis / diagnosis*
  • Treponema / immunology*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antibodies, Bacterial