Looking Upstream: Findings from Focus Groups on Public Perceptions of Source Water Quality in British Columbia, Canada

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141533. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

In association with the development of new microbial tests for source water quality (SWQ), focus groups with members of the public were conducted to gain insight into their perceptions of SWQ, behaviours and contaminants they think pose the greatest threat to its quality, and what/how they want to know about SWQ. Discussions revealed a low concern about SWQ in general, and in particular about microbial contamination. Participants identified behaviours that threaten SWQ, barriers to changing behaviour and suggestions for inducing change. A strong desire was expressed for water quality information to be interpreted and communicated in terms of how SWQ may impact human health and how their actions should be altered in response to test results. The information can be used to inform communication strategies and possibly impact policies associated with water quality testing and implementation of new tests. More broadly, awareness of the public's understanding and beliefs about source water can be used in working with the public to adopt water-friendly behaviours, influence the content and methods of communicating with the public about water issues and water quality, and could contribute to the direction of future research and investment into water technologies to align with the public's priorities.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude to Health
  • British Columbia
  • Drinking Water / microbiology
  • Drinking Water / standards
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Public Opinion*
  • Water Microbiology
  • Water Pollution
  • Water Quality*
  • Water Supply / standards
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Drinking Water

Grants and funding

Research for this article was conducted as part of the research project, ‘Applied Metagenomics of the Watershed Microbiome’ and was funded by Genome British Columbia (www.genomebc.ca) and Genome Canada (www.genomecanada.ca) [Grant #LSARP-165WAT]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.