Chemical, mechanical and biological properties of contemporary composite surface sealers

Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1474-86. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the chemical, mechanical, and biological properties of modern composite surface sealers (CSS) having different compositions.

Methods: The CSS products tested were Biscover LV (BC), Durafinish (DF), G-Coat Plus (GC), and Permaseal (PS). The tests performed were: (A): degree of conversion (DC%) by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy; (B): thickness of O2-inhibition layer by transmission optical microscopy; (C): surface hardness, 10 min after irradiation and following 1 week water storage, employing a Vickers indenter (VHN); (D): color (ΔE*) and gloss changes (ΔGU) after toothbrush abrasion, using L*a*b* colorimetry and glossimetry; (E): accelerated wear (GC,PS only) by an OHSU wear simulator plus 3D profilometric analysis, and (F): cytotoxicity testing of aqueous CSS eluents on human gingival fibroblast cultures employing the methyl-(3)H thymidine DNA labeling method. Statistical analyses included 1-way (A, B, ΔE*, ΔGU) and 2-way (C, F) ANOVAs, plus Tukey post hoc tests. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the results of the accelerated wear test (α=0.05 for all).

Results: The rankings of the statistical significant differences were: (A) PS (64.9)>DF,BC,GC (56.1-53.9) DC%; (B) DF,PS (12.3,9.8)>GC,BC (5.2,4.8) μm; (C): GC (37.6)>BC,DF (32.6,31.1)>PS (26.6) VHN (10 min/dry) and BC,DF (29.3,28.7)>GC(26.5)>PS(21.6) VHN (1w/water), with no significant material/storage condition interaction; (D): no differences were found among GC,DF,BC,PS (0.67-1.11) ΔE*, with all values within the visually acceptable range and PS,BC (32.8,29.4)>GC,DF (19.4,12.9) ΔGU; (E): no differences were found between GC and PS in volume loss (0.10,0.11 mm(3)), maximum (113.9,130.5 μm) and mean wear depths (30.3,27.5 μm); (F): at 1% v/v concentration, DF showed toxicity (23% vital cells vs 95-102% for others). However, at 5% v/v concentration DF (0%) and BC (9%) were the most toxic, whereas GC (58%) and PS (56%) showed moderate toxicity.

Significance: Important chemical, mechanical, and biological properties exist among the CSS tested, which may affect their clinical performance.

Keywords: Biocompatibility; Composite surface sealers; Curing; Hardness; Optical properties; Wear.

MeSH terms

  • Acrylates / chemistry*
  • Acrylates / radiation effects
  • Acrylates / toxicity
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Materials / radiation effects
  • Dental Materials / toxicity
  • Fibroblasts / drug effects
  • Gingiva / cytology
  • Hardness
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Mechanical Phenomena
  • Methylmethacrylate
  • Resin Cements / chemistry*
  • Resin Cements / radiation effects
  • Resin Cements / toxicity
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Acrylates
  • BisCover
  • Dental Materials
  • DuraFinish
  • G-Coat Plus
  • PermaSeal
  • Resin Cements
  • Methylmethacrylate