Background: This study assesses the outcomes of surgical vs. conservative management in the treatment of the Jones fracture.
Materials and methods: A systematic review using four databases from their inception until September 2014 was undertaken. Six studies were found evaluating operative therapy compared to conservative treatment.
Results: Six relevant studies were included, with a total of 237 patients. Of these, 51% were treated non-operatively, and 49% had surgical intervention. Those in the non-operative group were found to have a significantly higher odds ratio (OR) of fracture non-union (OR 5.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.65-12.40, P<0.001). Studies also reported a prolonged healing time and a longer time to return to sports. Of the trials with time to union as an outcome measure, 3 of 4 trials found favourable results in the operative cohort.
Conclusions: Surgical intervention is recommended for patients presenting with a Jones fracture as it is found to result in a lesser non-union rate and an improved time to union.
Keywords: Conservative; Jones fracture; Management; Nonunion; Surgical; Time to union.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.