When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record

EMBO J. 2015 Oct 14;34(20):2483-5. doi: 10.15252/embj.201570080.

Abstract

A reliable scientific literature is crucial for an efficient research process. Peer review remains a highly successful quality assurance mechanism, but it does not always prevent data and image aberrations and the publication of flawed data. Journals need to be in a position to detect such problems and take proportionate action. Publishers should apply consistent policies to correcting the published literature and adopt versioning. The scientific community ought to encourage corrections.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Data Accuracy
  • Editorial Policies*
  • Peer Review, Research / standards*
  • Retraction of Publication as Topic*