Gaps and Resemblances in Current Heart Failure Guidelines: A Clinical Perspective

Heart Fail Clin. 2015 Oct;11(4):529-41. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

Abstract

The newly available clinical guidelines in heart failure (HF) from Europe (2012), the United States (2010 and 2013), and Canada (2015) were compared, focusing on the systems for grading the evidence and classifying the recommendations, HF definitions, pharmacologic treatment, and devices used in HF. Some gaps were evident in the methodology for assessing evidence or in HF definitions. Pharmacologic treatments and recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are similar but some differences need to be considered by the practicing clinician. Guideline recommendations regarding new emergent treatments are becoming available.

Keywords: Gaps; Heart failure guidelines; Heart failure treatment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Canada
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / methods
  • Defibrillators, Implantable
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / diagnosis*
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States