Personal standards for judging aggression by a relationship partner: How much aggression is too much?

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jan;110(1):36-54. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000035. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

Abstract

What determines whether people tolerate partner aggression? This research examined how norms, relationship experiences, and commitment predict personal standards for judging aggressive acts by a partner. Studies 1a and 1b (n = 689) revealed that experiencing aggression in a current relationship and greater commitment predicted greater tolerance for common partner aggression. Study 2 longitudinally tracked individuals who had never experienced partner aggression (n = 52). Once aggression occurred, individuals adopted more tolerant standards, but only if they were highly committed. Study 3 involved experimentally manipulating the relevance of partner aggression among individuals who reported current partner aggression (n = 73); they were more tolerant of aggressive acts imagined to occur by their partner (vs. the same acts by a stranger), but only if they were highly committed. Personal standards for judging partner aggression are dynamic. They shift toward greater tolerance when committed people experience aggression in a current relationship.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aggression / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations*
  • Judgment*
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Sexual Partners / psychology*
  • Young Adult