Aim: Use of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in preterm infants is not supported by current evidence. In 2013, in Australia and New Zealand, 14% infants' ≤25 weeks of gestations were administered iNO. Within the cohort administered iNO, we aimed to identify subgroups where it may be more efficacious and compared characteristics before and after the set-up of the functional echocardiography (fEcho) programme.
Methods: A retrospective audit for the period 2000-2013 involving preterm infants administered iNO in the first four weeks of life was performed. Comparisons were made between the two time epochs: up to 2007 and post-2007.
Results: Eighty-five infants fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 62 (73%) were ≤28 weeks of gestation; 51 (60%) survived. Amongst survivors, gestation and birthweight were higher and oxygenation index (OI) was lower. Fourteen (16.5%) infants weighed small for gestation age; survival was lower in this subgroup (6/14, 43%, p = 0.0005). The fEcho programme increased prenitric assessments for a definitive diagnosis and monitoring; iNO was started earlier, at a lower OI with a trend towards reduced usage (hours).
Conclusion: Characteristics of subgroups (within the cohort of infants ≤34 weeks of gestation) more likely to benefit from iNO therapy were identified. Use of fEcho could rationalise usage.
Keywords: Audit; Echocardiography; Nitric oxide; Preterm.
©2015 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.