Validity of Self-Report of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Population at High Risk for Stroke

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Dec;24(12):2860-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

Abstract

Background: Screening for vascular risk factors is commonly assessed through self-report, despite reports of low sensitivity using this approach in healthy populations. The validity of self-reported vascular risk factors in a population at high risk for stroke has yet to be explored.

Aims: This study investigated the validity of self-reported cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and type II diabetes mellitus) in a population of patients with a recent history of high-risk transient ischemic attack or minor stroke.

Methods: Data were extracted from patient questionnaire responses and medical records (n = 101). Agreement between self-report and clinical measures (blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and active medications) was assessed using estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for each vascular risk factor.

Results: Forty-nine percent of the study population inaccurately self-reported at least 1 vascular risk factor. Sensitivities of self-report for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes were 84.5% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.1-92.2), 57.5% (CI: 44.1-69.7), and 77.8% (CI: 57.3-90.6), respectively, while specificities were 76.7% (CI: 61.0-87.7), 83.3% (CI: 67.3-93.2), and 95.4% (CI: 87.8-98.9), respectively. Accuracy of self-report for hypercholesterolemia was significantly lower than that for diabetes (P < .001) and hypertension (P < .05), with 42.6% of those with high cholesterol under-reporting their diagnosis. Logistic regression revealed that odds of accurate self-report were greater among younger adults and males.

Conclusions: These results highlight the need for clinicians, scientists, and epidemiologists to be cautious when screening for vascular risk factors using self-report measures as cross validation against objectives measures reveals poor sensitivity. Our results also highlight a lack of public education concerning these significant conditions.

Keywords: Stroke; TIA; screening; self-report; sensitivity; validity; vascular risk factors.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / complications*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / complications*
  • Dyslipidemias / complications*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / complications*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Report
  • Stroke / etiology*