The Diagnostic Value of Capillary Refill Time for Detecting Serious Illness in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0138155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138155. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Importance: Capillary refill time (CRT) is widely recommended as part of the routine assessment of unwell children.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of capillary refill time for a range of serious outcomes in children.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL from inception to June 2014. We included studies that measured both capillary refill time and a relevant clinical outcome such as mortality, dehydration, meningitis, or other serious illnesses in children aged up to 18 years of age. We screened 1,265 references, of which 24 papers were included in this review. Where sufficient studies were available, we conducted meta-analysis and constructed hierarchical summary ROC curves.

Results: Meta-analysis on the relationship between capillary refill time and mortality resulted in sensitivity of 34.6% (95% CI 23.9 to 47.1%), specificity 92.3% (88.6 to 94.8%), positive likelihood ratio 4.49 (3.06 to 6.57), and negative likelihood ratio 0.71 (0.60 to 0.84). Studies of children attending Emergency Departments with vomiting and diarrhea showed that capillary refill time had specificity of 89 to 94% for identifying 5% dehydration, but sensitivity ranged from 0 to 94%. This level of heterogeneity precluded formal meta-analysis of this outcome. Meta-analysis was not possible for other outcomes due to insufficient data, but we found consistently high specificity for a range of outcomes including meningitis, sepsis, admission to hospital, hypoxia, severity of illness and dengue.

Conclusions: Our results show that capillary refill time is a specific sign, indicating that it can be used as a "red-flag": children with prolonged capillary refill time have a four-fold risk of dying compared to children with normal capillary refill time. The low sensitivity means that a normal capillary refill time should not reassure clinicians.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Capillaries / physiology*
  • Child
  • Dehydration / diagnosis*
  • Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
  • Fever / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • Regional Blood Flow / physiology*
  • Severity of Illness Index*

Grants and funding

This paper presents independent research funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 305292 for the program “Supporting Life” (http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm). SF was funded by a fellowship award from the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR: http://www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/). PG received funding from the Rhodes Trust (http://www.rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk/), Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions (http://www.aihealthsolutions.ca/), and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca). JAT was funded by the University of Washington Pediatric Endowed Professorship for Research Sabbaticals (http://depts.washington.edu/givemed/prof-chair/endowments/pediatrics-endowed-professorship-for-research-sabbaticals/). CH also received funding from the NIHR SPCR (http://www.spcr.nihr.ac.uk/). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.