Lung protective ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery: a systematic review incorporating a Bayesian approach

BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 8;5(9):e007473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007473.

Abstract

Objective: Protective ventilation (PV) has been validated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, the effect of PV in patients undergoing major surgery is controversial. The study aimed to explore the beneficial effect of PV on patients undergoing a major operation by systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: Various levels of medical centres.

Participants: Patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Interventions: PV with low tidal volume.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Study end points included acute lung injury (ALI), pneumonia, atelectasis, mortality, length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO and EMBASE were searched from inception to May 2015. Search strategies consisted of terms related to PV and anaesthesia. We reported OR for binary outcomes including ALI, mortality, pneumonia, atelectasis and other adverse outcomes. Weighted mean difference was reported for continuous outcomes such as LOS in the ICU and hospital, pH value, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, oxygenation and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV).

Main results: A total of 22 citations were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. PV had protective effect against the development of ALI as compared with the control group, with an OR of 0.41 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.87). PV tended to be beneficial with regard to the development of pneumonia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.28) and atelectasis (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.01), but statistical significance was not reached. Other adverse outcomes such as new onset arrhythmia were significantly reduced with the use of PV (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.93).

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that PV can reduce the risk of ALI in patients undergoing major surgery. However, there is insufficient evidence that such a beneficial effect can be translated to more clinically relevant outcomes such as mortality or duration of MV.

Trial registration number: The study was registered in PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) under registration number CRD42013006416.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, General
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Critical Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Lung Diseases / etiology
  • Lung Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Models, Statistical
  • Perioperative Care* / methods
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
  • Respiration, Artificial* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.8679N