Purpose: The prognostic value of the expression of STAT3/phosphorylated-STAT3 on survival for cancer patients remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of the published literature in this field to identify its impact.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of 26 studies (n=3877 patients) that evaluated the relationship between the prognostic value and the expression of STAT3/phosphorylated-STAT3 in 15 different kinds of carcinomas. Studies evaluated the correlation between STAT3/phosphorylated-STAT3, which detected mostly by immunohistochemistry and western blot, and clinical staging, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were included. The impact of STAT3 and phosphorylated-STAT3 was analyzed separately.
Results: A total of 26 studies (14 for STAT3 and 16 for phosphorylated-STAT3), comprising 3877 patients, were included for meta-analysis. The expression of STAT3 was strongly associated with a poor impact on overall survival (OS) in all eligible studies [hazard ratio (HR)=2.91, (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91-4.42)], while a significant association was shown between the expression of phosphorylated-STAT3 and patients' outcome [HR=1.53, (95% CI, 0.86-2.70)]. No significant effect was shown between the expression of STAT3/phosphorylated-STAT3 and clinical staging, neither with DFS.
Conclusion: High expression of STAT3 seems to be associated with poor OS in patients with carcinomas, while phosphorylated-STAT3 does not.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; STAT3/phosphorylated-STAT3; prognosis; tumor.