Measurement of Thermal Effects of Doppler Ultrasound: An In Vitro Study

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0135717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135717. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound is considered a safe imaging modality and is routinely applied during early pregnancy. However, reservations are expressed concerning the application of Doppler ultrasound in early pregnancy due to energy emission of the ultrasound probe and its conversion to heat. The objective of this study was to evaluate the thermal effects of emitted Doppler ultrasound of different ultrasound machines and probes by means of temperature increase of in-vitro test-media.

Methods: We investigated the energy-output of 5 vaginal and abdominal probes of 3 ultrasound machines (GE Healthcare, Siemens, Aloka). Two in-vitro test objects were developed at the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna (water bath and hydrogel bath). Temperature increase during Doppler ultrasound emission was measured via thermal sensors, which were placed inside the test objects or on the probes' surface. Each probe was emitting for 5 minutes into the absorbing test object with 3 different TI/MI settings in Spectral Doppler mode.

Results: During water bath test, temperature increase varied between 0.1 and 1.0°C, depending on probe, setting and focus, and was found highest for spectral Doppler mode alone. Maximum temperature increase was found during the surface heating test, where values up to 2.4°C could be measured within 5 minutes of emission.

Conclusions: Activation of Doppler ultrasound in the waterbath model causes a significant increase of temperature within one minute. Thermally induced effects on the embryo cannot be excluded when using Doppler ultrasound in early pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Body Temperature
  • Female
  • Fetus
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Temperature*
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler / adverse effects*
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler / instrumentation
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal / adverse effects*
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal / instrumentation

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work. Material for conduction if this study was provided by the Center for Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering UltraSound-Lab, Medical University of Vienna and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna. The authors acknowledge the financial support for open access publication provided by the Karl Landsteiner Society, Institute for General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.