Characterization of the Intestinal Lactobacilli Community following Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Supplementation in the Neonatal Piglet

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135494. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Recently, prebiotic supplementation of infant formula has become common practice; however the impact on the intestinal microbiota has not been completely elucidated. In this study, neonatal piglets were randomized to: formula (FORM, n = 8), formula supplemented with 2 g/L each galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX, F+GP, n = 9) or a sow-reared (SOW, n = 12) reference group for 19 days. The ileal (IL) and ascending colon (AC) microbiota were characterized using culture-dependent and -independent methods. 16S amplicon sequencing identified no differences at the genera level in the IL. Interestingly, six genera in the AC were significantly different between FORM and F+GP (P<0.05): Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides, Oscillospira, Hydrogenoanaerobacterium and Catabacter. In particular, the relative abundance of AC Lactobacillus was higher (P = 0.04) in F+GP as compared to FORM. Culture-dependent analysis of the IL and AC lactobacilli communities of FORM and F+GP revealed a Lactobacillus spp. composition similar to 16S amplicon sequencing. Additional analysis demonstrated individual Lactobacillus isolates were unable to ferment PDX. Conversely, a majority of lactobacilli isolates could ferment GOS, regardless of piglet diet. In addition, the ability of lactobacilli isolates to ferment the longer chain GOS fragments (DP 3 or greater), which are expected to be present in the distal intestine, was not different between FORM and F+GP. In conclusion, prebiotic supplementation of formula impacted the AC microbiota; however, direct utilization of GOS or PDX does not lead to an increase in Lactobacillus spp.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Glucans / administration & dosage*
  • Intestines / microbiology*
  • Lactobacillus / isolation & purification*
  • Oligosaccharides / administration & dosage*
  • Prebiotics / administration & dosage
  • Swine

Substances

  • Glucans
  • Oligosaccharides
  • Prebiotics
  • polydextrose

Associated data

  • SRA/SRP049961

Grants and funding

This study was funded by Mead Johnson Nutrition who had a role in the study design. They had a limited role in the decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript but had no role in the collection and analysis of data. Mead Johnson Nutrition provided support in the form of a salary for author ZEJ, but did not have any additional role in the data collection and analysis. The specific role of this author is articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. Research and Testing Laboratory and Molecular Research LP provided support in the form of salaries for authors SBC and SED, respectively, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.