Knee kinematics and joint moments during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Br J Sports Med. 2016 May;50(10):597-612. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094797. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

Abstract

Background: Abnormal gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may contribute to development and/or progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of knee kinematics and joint moments during walking after ACLR.

Methods: We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists of relevant papers, for cross-sectional, human-based observational studies comparing knee joint kinematics and moments during level walking in individuals with ACLR, with the uninjured contralateral knee or healthy individuals as a control. Two independent reviewers appraised methodological quality (modified Downs and Black scale). Where possible, data were pooled by time post-ACLR (RevMan), otherwise narrative synthesis was undertaken.

Results: Thirty-four studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed significant sagittal plane deficits in ACLR knees. We found greater knee flexion angles (standardised mean difference: 1.06; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.74) and joint moments (1.61; 0.87 to 2.35) <6 months post-ACLR, compared to healthy controls. However, lower peak knee flexion angles were identified 1-3 years (-2.21; -3.16 to -1.26) and ≥3 years post-ACLR (-1.38, -2.14 to -0.62), and lower knee flexion moment 6-12 months post-ACLR (-0.76; -1.40 to -0.12). Pooled data provided strong evidence of no difference in peak knee adduction moment >3 years after ACLR (vs healthy controls) (0.09; -0.63 to 0.81). No transverse plane conclusions could be drawn.

Conclusions: Sagittal plane biomechanics, rather than the knee adduction moment, appear to be more relevant post-ACLR. Better understanding of sagittal plane biomechanics is necessary for optimal post-operative recovery, and to potentially prevent early onset and progression of knee OA after ACLR.

Trial registration number: PROSPERO systematic review protocol registration number CRD4201400882 2.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanics; Knee.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries / physiopathology*
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries / surgery
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction*
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Gait / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / physiology*
  • Postoperative Period