Cause-effect relationships in nutritional intervention studies for health claims substantiation: guidance for trial design

Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015 Jul:66 Suppl 1:S53-61. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2015.1025720.

Abstract

The growing worldwide interest on functional food research has been accompanied by increasing regulatory guidelines in this area, with the aim of ensuring that any claimed effect in foods, beyond their nutritional role, is based on scientific unequivocal evidence. In order to assess the cause-effect relationship between the regular consumption of a food or a food component and the beneficial outcome for the consumer, an appropriate study design is required. Previous knowledge and research on the specific claimed food or product may be an adequate basis for defining a hypothesis and accurate objectives. Other key factors to take into account are based on the outcomes studied, the length of the trial, sample size and type, as well as the transparency on reporting the results obtained. Based on the Consolidated Standards on Reporting Trials statement (CONSORT), together with the specific guidelines published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies, the present article aims at summarizing key questions conducting to the most appropriate study design for solid health claim substantiation.

Keywords: CONSORT statement; EFSA; health claim; nutritional interventions; study design.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • European Union
  • Food Labeling / standards*
  • Food Safety
  • Functional Food / standards*
  • Humans
  • Nutritive Value*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design*