Purpose: Sorafenib induces early vascularity reduction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We sought to identify differences in radiological assessment approaches and to evaluate their usefulness for the prediction of the initial response to sorafenib.
Methods: Forty-eight patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib were evaluated by four-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography. All target lesions were analyzed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the EASL criteria, and modified RECIST (mRECIST).
Results: At the initial evaluation at 4-6 weeks, rates of objective response (OR) (including both complete and partial responses), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were 2, 71, and 27 %, respectively, according to RECIST; 15, 56, and 29 %, respectively, according to the EASL criteria; and 15, 58, and 27 %, respectively, according to mRECIST. Patients who achieved an OR according to the EASL criteria also achieved an OR according to mRECIST. Patients who achieved an OR according to the EASL criteria or mRECIST had better predicted overall survival (OS) than did patients who achieved SD (p = 0.033 and 0.028, respectively). Patients with SD according to RECIST had different outcomes depending on the response according to enhancement criteria. Patients classified as responders (complete and partial) had better predicted OS than those classified as non-responders (those classified as SD and PD) (p = 0.048).
Conclusions: The enhancement criteria could be useful for prediction of the initial response to sorafenib in patients with HCC. Moreover, mRECIST appears to be simple and convenient.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Initial response; RECIST; Sorafenib; The EASL criteria; mRECIST.