Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

Ullah Najeeb; Michael P Bange; Daniel K Y Tan; Brian J Atwell

doi:10.1093/aobpla/plv080

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

AoB Plants. 2015 Jul 20:7:plv080. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv080.

Authors

Ullah Najeeb¹, Michael P Bange², Daniel K Y Tan¹, Brian J Atwell³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, NSW 2015, Australia.
² Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, NSW 2015, Australia CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Australian Cotton Research Institute, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia.
³ Department of Plant and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, NSW 2015, Australia Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia brian.atwell@mq.edu.au.

Abstract

Climatic variability, typified by erratic heavy-rainfall events, causes waterlogging in intensively irrigated crops and is exacerbated under warm temperature regimes on soils with poor internal drainage. Irrigated cotton is often grown in precisely these conditions, exposing it to waterlogging-induced yield losses after substantial summer rainfall. This calls for a deeper understanding of mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance and its relevance to cotton. Hence this review suggests possible causes of waterlogging-induced yield loss in cotton and approaches to improvement of waterlogging tolerance, drawing upon the slight body of published data in cotton and principles from other species. The yield penalty depends on soil type, phenological stage and cumulative period of root exposure to air-filled porosities below 10 %. Events in the soil include O2 deficiency in the root zone that changes the redox state of nutrients, making them unavailable (e.g. nitrogen) or potentially toxic for plants. Furthermore, root-derived hormones that are transported in the xylem have long been associated with oxygen deficits. These belowground effects (impaired root growth, nutrient uptake and transport, hormonal signalling) affect the shoots, interfering with canopy development, photosynthesis and radiation-use efficiency. Compared with the more waterlogging-tolerant cereals, cotton does not have identified adaptations to waterlogging in the root zone, forming no conspicuous root aerenchyma and having low fermentative activity. We speculate that these factors contribute substantially to the sensitivity of cotton to sustained periods of waterlogging. We discuss the impact of these belowground factors on shoot performance, photosynthesis and yield components. Management practices, i.e. soil aeration, scheduling irrigation and fertilizer application, can reduce waterlogging-induced damage. Limiting ethylene biosynthesis using anti-ethylene agents and down-regulating expression of genes controlling ethylene biosynthesis are strong candidates to minimize yield losses in waterlogged cotton crops. Other key pathways of anoxia tolerance are also cited as potential tools towards waterlogging-tolerant cotton genotypes.

Keywords: Cotton; ethylene; fermentation; hypoxia; photosynthesis; waterlogging.

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.