Data Quality in the Human and Environmental Health Sciences: Using Statistical Confidence Scoring to Improve QSAR/QSPR Modeling

J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Aug 24;55(8):1739-46. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00294. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

Abstract

A greater number of toxicity data are becoming publicly available allowing for in silico modeling. However, questions often arise as to how to incorporate data quality and how to deal with contradicting data if more than a single datum point is available for the same compound. In this study, two well-known and studied QSAR/QSPR models for skin permeability and aquatic toxicology have been investigated in the context of statistical data quality. In particular, the potential benefits of the incorporation of the statistical Confidence Scoring (CS) approach within modeling and validation. As a result, robust QSAR/QSPR models for the skin permeability coefficient and the toxicity of nonpolar narcotics to Aliivibrio fischeri assay were created. CS-weighted linear regression for training and CS-weighted root-mean-square error (RMSE) for validation were statistically superior compared to standard linear regression and standard RMSE. Strategies are proposed as to how to interpret data with high and low CS, as well as how to deal with large data sets containing multiple entries.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aliivibrio fischeri / drug effects
  • Computer Simulation
  • Data Accuracy
  • Environmental Health / methods*
  • Environmental Pollutants
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Models, Biological
  • Narcotics / toxicity
  • Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
  • Skin / metabolism
  • Skin Absorption

Substances

  • Environmental Pollutants
  • Narcotics