Bottom-up effects of a no-take zone on endangered penguin demographics

Biol Lett. 2015 Jul;11(7):20150237. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0237.

Abstract

Marine no-take zones can have positive impacts for target species and are increasingly important management tools. However, whether they indirectly benefit higher order predators remains unclear. The endangered African penguin (Spheniscus demersus) depends on commercially exploited forage fish. We examined how chick survival responded to an experimental 3-year fishery closure around Robben Island, South Africa, controlling for variation in prey biomass and fishery catches. Chick survival increased by 18% when the closure was initiated, which alone led to a predicted 27% higher population compared with continued fishing. However, the modelled population continued to decline, probably because of high adult mortality linked to poor prey availability over larger spatial scales. Our results illustrate that small no-take zones can have bottom-up benefits for highly mobile marine predators, but are only one component of holistic, ecosystem-based management regimes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Newborn
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods
  • Ecosystem
  • Endangered Species
  • Fisheries*
  • Fishes
  • Mortality
  • Population Dynamics
  • Predatory Behavior / physiology
  • South Africa
  • Spheniscidae / physiology*