Need for recovery among male technical distal on-call workers

Ergonomics. 2015;58(12):1927-38. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1046498. Epub 2015 Jun 15.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) examine whether need for recovery differs between workers (i) not on-call, (ii) on-call but not called and (iii) on-call and called, and (2) investigate the associations between age, health, work and social characteristics with need for recovery for the three scenarios (i-iii). Cross-sectional data of N = 169 Dutch distal on-call workers were analysed with multivariate logistic regression. Need for recovery differed significantly between the three scenarios (i-iii), with lowest need for recovery for scenario (i) 'not on-call' and highest need for recovery for scenario (iii) 'on-call and called'. Poor mental health and high work-family interference were associated with higher need for recovery in all three scenarios (i-iii), whereas high work demands was only associated with being on-call (ii and iii). The results suggest that the mere possibility of being called affects the need for recovery, especially in workers reporting poor mental health, high-work demands and work-family interference. Practitioner summary: On-call work is a scarcely studied but demanding working time arrangement. We examined need for recovery and its associations with age, health, work and social characteristics among distal on-call workers. The results suggest that the mere possibility of being called can affect worker well-being and need for recovery.

Keywords: age; health; work schedule tolerance; work–family interference.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Mental Health
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Needs Assessment*
  • Odds Ratio
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
  • Sleep*
  • Work Schedule Tolerance*
  • Work-Life Balance*
  • Workload*