Purpose: To evaluate the shade-matching performance of dental students when using a new light-correcting device with polarization filter.
Materials and methods: A total of 21 observers assessed the shade of the upper frontal teeth in one patient under three lighting conditions: daylight (A), daylight and a light-correcting device (Smile Lite, Switzerland) (B), daylight and a light-correcting device with a polarization filter attached (C) by using two shade guides: VITA Classical and 3D Master. Matching scores were calculated as a sum of the color differences between the reference shades and the selected shades (ΔEab *). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (α = 0.05).
Results: A significant difference was found between the shade-matching scores under the three lighting conditions (p < 0.001). However, pairwise comparisons showed that between A (ΔEab *A = 1,873.6) and C (ΔEab *C = 2,019.1), there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). The best matching scores were calculated for B (ΔEab *B = 1,652.5). Significant differences were found in respect to the observer's gender (p < 0.05) and color competency (p < 0.05), as well as with the shade guide used (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Dental students' shade-matching ability was better when the light-correcting device was used, but the addition of the filter to it did not prove beneficial. The shade guides used, the observer's gender, and color competency influenced the shade matching.
Clinical significance: The light-correcting device influenced the shade-matching performance; however, the attached polarization filter did not improve the results of the shade matching.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.