The academic advantage: gender disparities in patenting

PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128000. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

We analyzed gender disparities in patenting by country, technological area, and type of assignee using the 4.6 million utility patents issued between 1976 and 2013 by the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO). Our analyses of fractionalized inventorships demonstrate that women's rate of patenting has increased from 2.7% of total patenting activity to 10.8% over the nearly 40-year period. Our results show that, in every technological area, female patenting is proportionally more likely to occur in academic institutions than in corporate or government environments. However, women's patents have a lower technological impact than that of men, and that gap is wider in the case of academic patents. We also provide evidence that patents to which women--and in particular academic women--contributed are associated with a higher number of International Patent Classification (IPC) codes and co-inventors than men. The policy implications of these disparities and academic setting advantages are discussed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Gender Identity
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Organizations
  • Patents as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Technology / methods
  • United States

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs program (Vincent Larivière), Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Société et Culture (FRQSC) (Vincent Larivière), Social Sciences and Humanities Research Coucil of Canada (Vincent Larivière), and the NSF—SciSIP Program (Cassidy Sugimoto). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.