Randomised Introduction of 2-CDA as Intensification during Consolidation for Children with High-risk AML--results from Study AML-BFM 2004

Abstract

Background: The outcome in children and adolescents with high-risk (HR) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, in study AML-BFM 2004 we aimed to improve outcome of HR-patients by adding moderately dosed 2-Chloro-2-Deoxyadenosine (2-CDA) to the respective consolidation treatment backbone without increasing toxicity. The aim was to improve prognosis especially in FAB M4/M5/MLL patients, who represent the largest subgroup of HR patients.

Patients and methods: In total, 343 children and adolescents with HR-AML were randomized to receive or not 2-CDA (6 mg/m²/d, days 1, 3) in combination with cytarabine/idarubicine (AI=500 mg/m² cytarabine 5 days continuous infusion plus 7 mg/m²/d idarubicin, days 3 and 5).

Results: RESULTS for patients of the AI/2-CDA arm (n=168) vs. the AI-arm (n=175) were similar: 5-year overall survival 68±4 vs. 72±4%, plogrank=0.38, event-free survival 53±4 vs. 49±4%, plogrank=0.77; cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years: 35±4 vs. 37±4%, p(Gray)=0.89. RESULTS in patients with MLL rearrangement or FAB M4/M5 were also similar in the treatment groups. In addition, toxicities did not differ between the two arms.

Conclusion: We conclude that additional, moderate dose 2-CDA does not improve prognosis in HR-patients when given during consolidation treatment. Its effect might be too low in this multidrug regimen, where the strongest effects are achieved during induction, or the chosen dose of 2-CDA might have been too low.