Small and big quality in health care

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(4):356-66. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2014-0068.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to clarify healthcare quality's ontological and epistemological foundations; and examine how these lead to different measurements and technologies.

Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual analysis.

Findings: Small quality denotes conformance to ex ante requirements. Big quality includes product and service design, based on customer requirements and expectations. Healthcare quality can be divided into three areas: clinical decision making; patient safety; and patient experience, each with distinct measurement and improvement technologies.

Practical implications: The conceptual model is expected to bring clarity to constructing specific definitions, measures, objectives and technologies for improving healthcare.

Originality/value: This paper claims that before healthcare quality can be defined, measured and integrated into systems, it needs to be clearly separated into ontologically and epistemologically different parts.

Keywords: Clinical decision making; Integrated quality; Patient experience; Patient safety; Quality definition; Quality healthcare; Quality system.

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making
  • Health Services Research / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Knowledge
  • Patient Safety
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality of Health Care*