Enhanced equivalence class formation by the delay and relational functions of meaningful stimuli

J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):524-41. doi: 10.1002/jeab.152.

Abstract

Undergraduates in six groups of 10 attempted to form three 3-node 5-member equivalence classes (A → B → C → D → E) under the simultaneous protocol. In five of six groups, all stimuli were abstract shapes; in the PIC group, C stimuli were pictures with the remainder being abstract shapes. Before class formation, participants in the Identity-S and Identity-D groups were given preliminary training to form identity conditional discriminations with the C stimuli using simultaneous and 6 s delayed matching-to-sample procedures, respectively. In the Arbitrary-S and Arbitrary-D groups, before class formation, arbitrary conditional discriminations were formed between C and X stimuli using simultaneous and 6 s delayed matching-to-sample procedures, respectively. With no preliminary training, classes in the PIC and ABS groups were formed by 80% and 0% of participants, respectively. After preliminary training, class formation (yield) increased with delay, regardless of relational type. For each of the two delays, yield was slightly greater after forming arbitrary- instead of identity-relations. Yield was greatest, however, when a class contained a meaningful stimulus (PIC). During failed class formation, probes produced experimenter-defined relations, participant-defined relations, and unsystematic responding; delay, but not the relation type in preliminary training influenced relational and indeterminate responding. These results suggest how meaningful stimuli enhance equivalence class formation.

Keywords: arbitrary conditional relations; college students; concurrent; delayed matching to sample; enhanced class formation; identity conditional relations; linear series training structure; simultaneous protocol; stimulus equivalence.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Association Learning*
  • Concept Formation*
  • Discrimination Learning
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Time Factors
  • Young Adult