Objective: To compare F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and F-18-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT examinations for differentiating between benign and malignant adrenal tumours.
Methods: Thirty lipid-poor benign and 11 malignant tumours of 40 patients were included. FDG- and FLT-based indices including visual score, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and FDG adrenal lesion/liver SUVmax (A/L SUVmax) or FLT adrenal lesion/back muscle SUVmax (A/B SUVmax) ratio were compared between benign and malignant tumours using the Mann-Whitney's U or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and their diagnostic performances were evaluated by means of the area under the curve (AUC) values derived from the receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Results: All indices were significantly higher in malignant than benign tumours on both images (p < 0.05 each). On FDG-PET/CT, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 91 %, 63 % and 71 % for visual score, 91 %, 67 % and 73 % for SUVmax, and 100 %, 70 % and 78 % for A/L SUVmax ratio, respectively. On FLT-PET/CT, they were 100 %, 97 % and 98 % for visual score, SUVmax and A/B SUVmax ratio, respectively. All FLT indices were significantly higher than those of FDG in AUC (p < 0.05 each).
Conclusion: FLT-PET/CT may be superior to FDG-PET/CT in differentiating lipid-poor benign from malignant adrenal tumours because of higher specificity and accuracy.
Key points: • All FDG indices were significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumours. • All FLT indices were significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumours. • All FLT indices were significantly higher than those of FDG in AUC.
Keywords: Adrenal; Adrenal tumour; FDG; FLT; PET/CT.