Sedation scoring and managing abilities of intensive care nurses post educational intervention

Nurs Crit Care. 2017 May;22(3):141-149. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12180. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate sedation assessment can jeopardize patient comfort and safety. Therefore, nurses' abilities in assessing and managing sedation are vital for effective care of mechanically ventilated patients.

Aims and objectives: This study assessed nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities as primary outcomes following educational interventions. Nurses' perceived self-confidence and barriers to effective sedation management were assessed as secondary outcomes.

Design: A post-test-only quasi-experimental design was used. Data were collected at 3 and 9 months post-intervention.

Methods: A total of 66 nurses from a 14-bed intensive care unit of a Malaysian teaching hospital participated. The educational interventions included theoretical sessions, hands-on sedation assessment practice using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and a brief sedation assessment tool. Nurses' sedation scoring and management abilities and perceived self-confidence level were assessed at both time points using self-administered questionnaires with case scenarios. Sedation assessment and management barriers were assessed once at 9 months post-intervention.

Results: Median scores for overall accurate sedation scoring (9 months: 4·00; 3 months: 2·00, p = 0·0001) and overall sedation management (9 months: 14·0; 3 months: 7·0, p = 0·0001) were significantly higher at 9 months compared to 3 months post-intervention. There were no significant differences in the perceived self-confidence level for rating sedation level. Overall perceived barrier scores were low (M = 27·78, SD = 6·26, possible range = 11·0-55·0). Patient conditions (M = 3·68, SD = 1·13) and nurses' workload (M = 3·54, SD = 0·95) were the greatest barriers to effective sedation assessment and management. Demographic variables did not affect sedation scoring or management abilities.

Conclusions: Positive changes in nurses' sedation assessment and management abilities were observed, indicating that adequate hands-on clinical practice following educational interventions can improve nurses' knowledge and skills.

Relevance to clinical practice: Educational initiatives are necessary to improve ICU practice, particularly in ICUs with inexperienced nurses.

Keywords: Case scenario assessment; Clinical decision-making; Intensive care nurses; Perceived barriers; Sedation assessment and management.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Conscious Sedation / nursing*
  • Critical Care / organization & administration*
  • Critical Care Nursing / education*
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Teaching
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage*
  • Intensive Care Units / organization & administration
  • Malaysia
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Comfort
  • Patient Safety
  • Respiration, Artificial / nursing
  • Risk Assessment
  • Self Concept
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Hypnotics and Sedatives