Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes

Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul:80:125-41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

Abstract

Construction safety management involves complex issues (e.g., different trades, multi-organizational project structure, constantly changing work environment, and transient workforce). Systems thinking is widely considered as an effective approach to understanding and managing the complexity. This paper aims to better understand dynamic complexity of construction safety management by exploring archetypes of construction safety. To achieve this, this paper adopted the ground theory method (GTM) and 22 interviews were conducted with participants in various positions (government safety inspector, client, health and safety manager, safety consultant, safety auditor, and safety researcher). Eight archetypes were emerged from the collected data: (1) safety regulations, (2) incentive programs, (3) procurement and safety, (4) safety management in small businesses (5) production and safety, (6) workers' conflicting goals, (7) blame on workers, and (8) reactive and proactive learning. These archetypes capture the interactions between a wide range of factors within various hierarchical levels and subsystems. As a free-standing tool, they advance the understanding of dynamic complexity of construction safety management and provide systemic insights into dealing with the complexity. They also can facilitate system dynamics modelling of construction safety process.

Keywords: Archetypes; Construction safety; Risk analysis; System dynamics; Systems thinking.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Construction Industry / organization & administration*
  • Grounded Theory
  • Humans
  • Occupational Health*
  • Organizational Culture
  • Qualitative Research
  • Safety Management / organization & administration*
  • Systems Analysis
  • Workplace