Mixed Methods Research: The "Thing-ness" Problem

Qual Health Res. 2015 Jun;25(6):775-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580558. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

Abstract

Contemporary mixed methods research (MMR) veers away from a "loosely bounded" to a "bounded" concept that has important negative implications for how qualitatively driven mixed methods approaches are positioned in the field of mixed methods and overall innovation in the praxis of MMR. I deploy the concept of reification defined as taking an object/abstraction and treating it as if it were real such that it takes on the quality of "thing-ness," having a concrete independent existence. I argue that the contemporary reification of mixed methods as a "thing" is fueled by three interrelated factors: (a) the growing formalization of mixed methods as design, (b) the unexamined belief in the "synergy" of mixed methods and, (c) the deployment of a "practical pragmatism" as the "philosophical partner" for mixed methods inquiry.

Keywords: qualitative methods; qualitatively driven mixed methods; reification; triangulation.

MeSH terms

  • Evaluation Studies as Topic*
  • Health Services Research / methods*
  • Health Services Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Qualitative Research
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design*