Excess costs of comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123292. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Comorbidities are often reported in patients with COPD and may influence the cost of care. Yet, the extent by which comorbidities affect costs remains to be determined.

Objectives: To review, quantify and evaluate excess costs of comorbidities in COPD.

Methods: Using a systematic review approach, Pubmed and Embase were searched for studies analyzing excess costs of comorbidities in COPD. Resulting studies were evaluated according to study characteristics, comorbidity measurement and cost indicators. Mark-up factors were calculated for respective excess costs. Furthermore, a checklist of quality criteria was applied.

Results: Twelve studies were included. Nine evaluated comorbidity specific costs; three examined index-based results. Pneumonia, cardiovascular disease and diabetes were associated with the highest excess costs. The mark-up factors for respective excess costs ranged between 1.5 and 2.5 in the majority of cases. On average the factors constituted a doubling of respective costs in the comorbid case. The main cost driver, among all studies, was inpatient cost. Indirect costs were not accounted for by the majority of studies. Study heterogeneity was high.

Conclusions: The reviewed studies clearly show that comorbidities are associated with significant excess costs in COPD. The inclusion of comorbid costs and effects in future health economic evaluations of preventive or therapeutic COPD interventions seems highly advisable.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mortality
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / epidemiology*
  • Risk Factors

Grants and funding

Financial support for this study by the German Center for Lung Research (DZL, BMBF) is gratefully acknowledged. Funding received by RL; (http://www.dzl.de/index.php/en/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.