Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics?

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):E469-75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000818.

Abstract

Study design: A 3-dimensional finite element investigation.

Objective: To compare the biomechanical performances of different rotation centers (RCs) in the prevalent artificial cervical discs.

Summary of background data: Various configurations are applied in artificial discs. Design parameters may influence the biomechanics of implanted spine. The RC is a primary variation in the popular artificial discs.

Methods: Implantation of 5 prostheses was simulated at C5-C6 on the basis of a validated finite element cervical model (C3-C7). The prostheses included ball-in-socket design with a fixed RC located on the inferior endplate (BS-FI) and on the superior endplate (BS-FS), with a mobile RC at the inferior endplate (BS-MI), dual articulation with a mobile RC between the endplates (DA-M), and sliding articulation with various RCs (SA-V). The spinal motions in flexion and extension served as a displacement loading at the C3 vertebrae.

Results: Total disc replacements reduced extension moment. The ball-in-socket designs required less flexion moment, whereas the flexion stiffness of the spines with DA-M and SA-V was similar to that of the healthy model. The contributions of the implanted level to the global motions increased in the total disc replacements, except in the SA-V and DA-M models (in flexion). Ball-in-socket designs produced severe stress distributions in facet cartilage, whereas DA-M and SA-V produced more severe stress distribution on the bone-implant interface.

Conclusion: Cervical stability was extremely affected in extension and partially affected in flexion by total disc replacement. With the prostheses with mobile RC, cervical curvature was readjusted under a low follower load. The SA-V and BS-FS designs exhibited better performances in the entire segmental stiffness and in the stability of the operative level than the BS-MI and BS-FI designs in flexion. The 5 designs demonstrated varying advantages relative to the stress distribution in the facet cartilages and on the bone-implant interface.

Level of evidence: 5.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Joint Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Rotation*
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Total Disc Replacement / instrumentation*
  • Zygapophyseal Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Zygapophyseal Joint / physiopathology
  • Zygapophyseal Joint / surgery*