Should the governments of 'developed' countries be held responsible for equalizing the indigenous health gap?

Glob Health Promot. 2016 Dec;23(4):70-72. doi: 10.1177/1757975915574255. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Abstract

Across the globe there is significant variation between and within indigenous populations in terms of world view, culture, and socio-political forces. However, many indigenous groups do share a striking commonality: greater rates of non-communicable diseases and shorter life expectancies than non-indigenous compatriots. Notably, this health gap persists for 'developed' countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. The question of who is responsible for equalizing the gap is complicated. Using Australia as an exemplar context, this commentary will present arguments 'for' and 'against' the governments of developed nations being held liable for closing the indigenous health gap. We will discuss the history and nature of the health gap, actions needed to 'close the gap', and which party has the necessary resources to do so.

Keywords: disparity; government; health care; health gap; indigenous health.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Developed Countries
  • Government
  • Health Services, Indigenous / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Health Status Disparities
  • Humans
  • Life Expectancy
  • New Zealand
  • Population Groups
  • Social Determinants of Health / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • United States