How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0119881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119881. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Biodiversity*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / economics*
  • Forests*
  • Humans
  • Mexico

Grants and funding

SC,EC,DE: Biodiversa Framework Project INVALUABLE: Values, Markets, and Policies for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (PRI-PIMBDV-2011- 1072), http://www.biodiversa.org/118. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. EC: ‘Ramón y Cajal’ research fellowship (Corbera) granted by the Spanish Research, Development and Innovation Secretariat (RYC-2010-07183). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. KB: USDA-NIFA Hatch project number #470-362. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.