Regional gray matter density associated with cognitive reflectivity-impulsivity: evidence from voxel-based morphometry

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0122666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122666. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

When faced with a problem or choice, humans can use two different strategies: "cognitive reflectivity," which involves slow responses and fewer mistakes, or "cognitive impulsivity," which comprises of quick responses and more mistakes. Different individuals use these two strategies differently. To our knowledge, no study has directly investigated the brain regions involved in reflectivity-impulsivity; therefore, this study focused on associations between these cognitive strategies and the gray matter structure of several brain regions. In order to accomplish this, we enrolled 776 healthy, right-handed individuals (432 men and 344 women; 20.7 ± 1.8 years) and used voxel-based morphometry with administration of a cognitive reflectivity-impulsivity questionnaire. We found that high cognitive reflectivity was associated with greater regional gray matter density in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Our finding suggests that this area plays an important role in defining an individual's trait associated with reflectivity and impulsivity.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cognition / physiology*
  • Female
  • Gray Matter / anatomy & histology*
  • Gray Matter / physiology
  • Humans
  • Impulsive Behavior / physiology*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Prefrontal Cortex / anatomy & histology*
  • Prefrontal Cortex / physiology
  • Psychometrics
  • Regression Analysis
  • Sex Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was supported by JST/RISTEX, JST/CREST, a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (KAKENHI 23700306), a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (KAKENHI 25700012) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and Tohoku University international Advanced Research and Education Organization. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.