Pigment-based chemotaxonomy--a quick alternative to determine algal assemblages in large shallow eutrophic lake?

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0122526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122526. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Pigment-based chemotaxonomy and CHEMTAX software have proven to be a valuable phytoplankton monitoring tool in marine environments, but are yet underdeveloped to determine algal assemblages in freshwater ecosystems. The main objectives of this study were (1) to compare the results of direct microscopy and CHEMTAX in describing phytoplankton community composition dynamics in a large, shallow and eutrophic lake; (2) to analyze the efficiency of the pigment-based method to detect changes in phytoplankton seasonal dynamics and during rapid bloom periods; (3) to assess the suitability of specific marker pigments and available marker pigment:chlorophyll a ratios to follow seasonal changes in eutrophic freshwater environment. A 5-year (2009-2013) parallel phytoplankton assessment by direct microscopy and by CHEMTAX was conducted using published marker pigment:chlorophyll a ratios. Despite displaying some differences from microscopy results, the pigment-based method successfully described the overall pattern of phytoplankton community dynamics during seasonal cycle in a eutrophic lake. Good agreement between the methods was achieved for most phytoplankton groups - cyanobacteria, chlorophytes, diatoms and cryptophytes. The agreement was poor in case of chrysophytes and dinoflagellates. Our study shows clearly that published marker pigment:chlorophyll a ratios can be used to describe algal class abundances, but they need to be calibrated for specific freshwater environment. Broader use of this method would enable to expand monitoring networks and increase measurement frequencies of freshwater ecosystems to meet the goals of the Water Framework Directive.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chlorophyll / analysis
  • Chlorophyll A
  • Classification / methods*
  • Estonia
  • Eutrophication*
  • Lakes / microbiology*
  • Microbiota*
  • Microscopy
  • Phytoplankton / chemistry*
  • Phytoplankton / classification*
  • Phytoplankton / cytology
  • Pigments, Biological / analysis*

Substances

  • Pigments, Biological
  • Chlorophyll
  • Chlorophyll A

Grants and funding

The study was supported by the Estonian Research Council (http://www.etag.ee/en/) through the European Regional Development Fund, Environmental Conservation and Environmental Technology R&D Programme project VeeOBS (3.2.0802.11-0043) (to author RF); by institutional research grant IUT21-2 (to authors TN, IT); and by Estonian Science Foundation grants 8511 (to authors RF, IT), 8373 (to author RF), and 9102 (to authors TN, MT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.