Additional review of Mohs slides to optimize Mohs micrographic surgery

Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jul;173(1):123-7. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13750. Epub 2015 May 28.

Abstract

Background: One significant risk factor for recurrence after Mohs surgery is misinterpretation of slides.

Objectives: To determine how often pathologists detected incompletely excised basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on Mohs slides and to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCCs.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1653 BCCs treated with Mohs surgery in a university hospital between 2007 and 2011. For routine quality assurance, all slides were additionally reviewed by a pathologist within 1 week of the procedure. For this study, all cases that had divergent interpretations were re-evaluated by a Mohs surgeon and a pathologist. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with Mohs surgeon effects as random effects were used to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCC.

Results: Incompletely excised BCCs were detected in 31 cases (2%), in which defects > 20 mm in diameter were an independent risk factor (odds ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval 1.55-8.28). Other studied variables (i.e. aggressive subtype, previously treated BCC, location on nose and > 2 Mohs stages) did not affect the risk of incompletely excised BCCs.

Conclusions: The additional review of Mohs slides might increase accurate interpretation, especially in large BCCs.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Basal Cell / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Basal Cell / surgery*
  • Clinical Competence / standards
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mohs Surgery / standards*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / pathology
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / surgery*
  • Neoplasm, Residual
  • Pathology, Clinical / standards
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Skin Neoplasms / pathology
  • Skin Neoplasms / surgery*