Atrio-ventricular valve regurgitation in univentricular hearts: outcomes after repair†

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 May;20(5):622-9; discussion 629-30. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv011. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to describe the early and mid-term outcome after atrio-ventricular valve (AVV) repair in patients with univentricular hearts (UVHs) and to identify risk factors for AVV reoperation and death.

Methods: This study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing valve repair for AVV regurgitation at any stage of univentricular palliation from 1998 to 2014. Patient- and procedure-related variables were analysed.

Results: A total of 31 consecutive patients underwent 38 procedures for ≥ moderate AVV regurgitation at a median age of 3.6 years. Thirty-two percent of patients had a common AVV, 26% had two AVVs, 22% had a dominant tricuspid valve and 19% had a dominant mitral valve. All patients underwent valve repair as a first procedure without early mortality. At discharge, patients preserved their ventricular function (fractional shortening <30%: preoperative 16% vs postoperative 22.5%, NS). In 19% (n = 6) of patients, the procedure was considered as failed because of significant residual regurgitation. There were three late deaths [median delay: 1 year (range 0.7-13.6)] and three heart transplantations. Six patients underwent seven AVV reoperations [median delay: 2 years (range 0.2-7.6)]. Longer intensive care stay (P = 0.022), longer total postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.039), higher total number of surgeries (P = 0.039), lower body mass index (P = 0.042) and higher preoperative mean pulmonary pressure (P = 0.047) were univariate risk factors for death/transplantation. Failed first AVV repair (P = 0.01), higher total number of surgeries (P = 0.026), lower body mass index (P = 0.031), male gender (P = 0.031) and need for valve repair before bidirectional cavopulmonary connection (P = 0.036) were univariate risk factors for AVV reoperation. In multivariate analysis, no univariate risk factor reached statistical significance. Freedom from death/transplantation was 84% (CI 95%: 70%-98%) at 5 and 10 years. Survival free from AVV reoperation was 72% (CI 95%: 52%-92%) at 5 years and 62% at 10 years (CI 95%: 36%-88%). Mean follow-up of survivors was 4.7 years (SD ± 4.3; range 0.2-15.6). At last visit, 96% of survivors were in NYHA Class I-II. Ninety-two percent had a ≤ mild residual regurgitation.

Conclusions: In patients with a UVH and ≥ moderate AVV regurgitation, AVV repair is feasible without postoperative deterioration of their ventricular function. Nevertheless, these patients remain at increased risk for death/transplantation and AVV reoperation.

Keywords: Atrio-ventricular valve; Univentricular heart; Valve repair.

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Echocardiography, Doppler
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • France
  • Heart Defects, Congenital / diagnostic imaging
  • Heart Defects, Congenital / surgery
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / mortality*
  • Heart Ventricles / abnormalities*
  • Hospital Mortality*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / diagnostic imaging
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / mortality
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Postoperative Complications / physiopathology
  • Postoperative Complications / surgery
  • Reoperation / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Survival Analysis
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome