Impact of polymerase chain reaction testing on Clostridium difficile infection rates in an acute health care facility

Am J Infect Control. 2015 Apr 1;43(4):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.12.021. Epub 2015 Feb 14.

Abstract

Two rapid methods of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis were compared between June 2012 and March 2013: a GeneXpert (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, Calif) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The influence of these methods on the detection of hospital-acquired CDI and identification of CDI outbreaks was evaluated. We tested 1,592 stool samples for C difficile. The GeneXpert PCR test identified 211 positive samples (68 determined to be hospital-acquired infection), whereas EIA identified 105 positive samples (36 determined to be hospital-acquired infection). The GeneXpert PCR method in contrast to the EIA method increased the detection rates of nosocomial CDI cases and contributed to the declaration of CDI outbreaks.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; Outbreak; PCR testing.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Clostridioides difficile / isolation & purification*
  • Clostridium Infections / diagnosis*
  • Cross Infection / diagnosis*
  • Disease Outbreaks*
  • Female
  • Health Facilities*
  • Humans
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*