Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the prognostic importance of pre-operative Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification in ultrasound imaging.

Methods: Histopathological differences and disease-free survival were analyzed in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors.

Results: We identified 531 invasive breast cancer patients eligible for this study. Most patients classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5 had large tumors and a higher rate of lymph node metastasis. However, hormonal receptor or HER-2 status did not differ according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification. During a median post-operative follow-up of 42.0 months, 43 patients were diagnosed with a disease-specific event. Disease-free survival was significantly lower in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5 than in patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3-4. Subgroup analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer of Stage I showed that Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5 was an independent negative prognostic indicator of disease-free survival (hazard ratio 9.195; 95% confidence interval, 1.175-71.955; P = 0.035).

Conclusions: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification might be considered as prognostic factors especially in Stage I breast cancer. Further confirmatory studies are needed.

Keywords: BI-RADS; breast cancer; ultrasound.