Endonuclease specificity and sequence dependence of type IIS restriction enzymes

PLoS One. 2015 Jan 28;10(1):e0117059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117059. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Restriction enzymes that recognize specific sequences but cleave unknown sequence outside the recognition site are extensively utilized tools in molecular biology. Despite this, systematic functional categorization of cleavage performance has largely been lacking. We established a simple and automatable model system to assay cleavage distance variation (termed slippage) and the sequence dependence thereof. We coupled this to massively parallel sequencing in order to provide sensitive and accurate measurement. With this system 14 enzymes were assayed (AcuI, BbvI, BpmI, BpuEI, BseRI, BsgI, Eco57I, Eco57MI, EcoP15I, FauI, FokI, GsuI, MmeI and SmuI). We report significant variation of slippage ranging from 1-54%, variations in sequence context dependence, as well as variation between isoschizomers. We believe this largely overlooked property of enzymes with shifted cleavage would benefit from further large scale classification and engineering efforts seeking to improve performance. The gained insights of in-vitro performance may also aid the in-vivo understanding of these enzymes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Base Sequence
  • Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific / genetics*
  • Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific / metabolism
  • Endonucleases / genetics*
  • Endonucleases / metabolism
  • Substrate Specificity

Substances

  • Endonucleases
  • Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific

Associated data

  • SRA/SRS627913

Grants and funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 (under grant agreement 222913) http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm, the Norwegian SkatteFUNN system, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, and the Swedish Scientific Council. At the time when the experiments were performed, Finn Terje-Hegge, Napoleon Foam, Erik Pettersson, Max Käller, Valtteri Wirta and Preben Lexow were employed by LingVitae AS. LingVitae AS provided support in the form of salaries for authors Finn Terje-Hegge, Napoleon Foam, Erik Pettersson, Max Käller, Valtteri Wirta and Preben Lexow, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.