Properties and ATRP activity of copper complexes with substituted tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine-based ligands

Inorg Chem. 2015 Feb 16;54(4):1474-86. doi: 10.1021/ic502484s. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

Abstract

Synthesis, characterization, electrochemical studies, and ATRP activity of a series of novel copper(I and II) complexes with TPMA-based ligands containing 4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-substituted pyridine arms were reported. In the solid state, Cu(I)(TPMA*(1))Br, Cu(I)(TPMA*(2))Br, and Cu(I)(TPMA*(3))Br complexes were found to be distorted tetrahedral in geometry and contained coordinated bromide anions. Pseudo-coordination of the aliphatic nitrogen atom to the copper(I) center was observed in Cu(I)(TPMA*(2))Br and Cu(I)(TPMA*(3))Br complexes, whereas pyridine arm dissociation occurred in Cu(I)(TPMA*(1))Br. All copper(I) complexes with substituted TPMA ligands exhibited a high degree of fluxionality in solution. At low temperature, Cu(I)(TPMA*(1))Br was found to be symmetrical and monomeric, while dissociation of either unsubstituted pyridine and/or 4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-substituted pyridine arms was observed in Cu(I)(TPMA*(2))Br and Cu(I)(TPMA*(3))Br. On the other hand, the geometry of the copper(II) complexes in the solid state deviated from ideal trigonal bipyramidal, as confirmed by a decrease in τ values ([Cu(II)(TPMA*(1))Br][Br] (τ = 0.92) > [Cu(II)(TPMA*(3))Br][Br] (τ = 0.77) > [Cu(II)(TPMA*(2))Br][Br] (τ = 0.72)). Furthermore, cyclic voltammetry studies indicated a nearly stepwise decrease (ΔE ≈ 60 mV) of E1/2 values relative to SCE (TPMA (-240 mV) > TPMA*(1) (-310 mV) > TPMA*(2) (-360 mV) > TPMA*(3) (-420 mV)) on going from [Cu(II)(TPMA)Br][Br] to [Cu(II)(TPMA*(3))Br][Br], confirming that the presence of electron-donating groups in the 4 (-OMe) and 3,5 (-Me) positions of the pyridine rings in TPMA increases the reducing ability of the corresponding copper(I) complexes. This increase was mostly the result of a stronger influence of substituted TPMA ligands toward stabilization of the copper(II) oxidation state (log β(I) = 13.4 ± 0.2, log β(II) = 19.3 (TPMA*(1)), 20.5 (TPMA*(2)), and 21.5 (TPMA*(3))). Lastly, ARGET ATRP kinetic studies show that with more reducing catalysts an induction period is observed. This was attributed to slow regeneration of Cu(I) species from the corresponding Cu(II).