Classification of middle fossa floor dehiscence syndromes

J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):557-63. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS132798. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

Abstract

Object: Middle fossa floor dehiscence (MFFD) can present as multiple syndromes depending on dehiscence location, tissue herniation, and dural integrity. The authors propose a classification system for MFFD with the potential to guide clinical decision making.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records (years 1995-2012) of patients who had undergone temporal craniotomy for the surgical repair of an MFFD syndrome at a single institution was undertaken. Reviewed data included demographic, operative, presentation, and outcome details. Middle fossa floor dehiscence was classified as follows: Class A, bony dehiscence without herniation of the brain and/or meninges; Class B, herniation of the brain and/or meninges through the middle fossa floor without CSF leakage; Class C, dehiscence with CSF leakage without meningitis; or Class D, dehiscence with meningitis.

Results: Fifty-one patients, 22 males and 29 females, were included in the analysis. The mean age was 48.7 ± 15.5 years, mean body mass index was 32.65 ± 6.86 kg/m(2), and mean symptom duration was 33 ± 42 months. Seven patients underwent repeat surgery for symptomatic recurrence; therefore, there were 58 surgical encounters. Repair included bony reconstruction with hydroxyapatite with or without resection of encephaloceles and/or repair of a dural defect. According to the MFFD classification system described, 15, 8, 27, and 8 cases were categorized as Class A, B, C, and D, respectively. The prevalence of hearing loss was 87%, 63%, and 70% in Classes A, B, and C, respectively. Vestibular symptoms were more prevalent in Class A. Seven patients reported persistent symptoms at the last follow-up. Transient complications were similar in each classification (13%-25%), and a single permanent complication related to anesthesia was observed. There were no mortalities or severe neurological morbidities in the series.

Conclusions: Middle fossa floor dehiscence has a spectrum of clinical presentations. A classification system may help to clarify the diagnosis and guide therapy. Surgery, the mainstay of treatment, is safe and well tolerated.

Keywords: BMI = body mass index; MFFD = middle fossa floor dehiscence; OHSU = Oregon Health & Science University; Tullio's phenomenon; middle fossa floor dehiscence; surgical outcomes; surgical stratification; surgical technique.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Cranial Fossa, Middle / pathology*
  • Encephalocele / diagnosis*
  • Encephalocele / pathology*
  • Encephalocele / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neurosurgical Procedures
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Postoperative Period
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Syndrome
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult