The blind spot in risk ethics: managing natural hazards

Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):354-60. doi: 10.1111/risa.12293. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

Abstract

Many risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards.

Keywords: Distribution problem; ethics; natural hazard; responsibility.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Decision Making
  • Disasters*
  • Informed Consent
  • Risk Assessment / ethics*
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Management / ethics*
  • Risk Management / methods