[The accuracy of CT and tumor markers in the detection of a recurrent ovarian carcinoma]

Gan No Rinsho. 1989 Sep;35(10):1127-31.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Twenty-three patients previously diagnosed as having ovarian cancer were examined with both serum tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, TPA, IAP, AFP) and a pelvic CT scan. The tumor markers predict the clinical outcome more accurately than the CT scan. Further, the tumor markers showed a clear correlation with the clinical course. But in one case, however, the tumor markers were seen to reduce below the normal level from chemotherapy, while the CT scan showed a tumor mass. Thus, both, a CT scan and tumor marker assays are felt to be indispensable for detecting the recurrence of an ovarian cancer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous / diagnosis
  • Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous / diagnostic imaging
  • Adenocarcinoma, Scirrhous / diagnosis
  • Adenocarcinoma, Scirrhous / diagnostic imaging
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis*
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnostic imaging
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor