The surprising benefit of passive-aggressive behaviour at Christmas parties: being crowned king of the crackers

Med J Aust. 2014 Dec 11;201(11):694-6. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01392.

Abstract

Objective: To test the effects of technique and attitude in pulling Christmas crackers.

Design, setting and participants: A binomial trial conducted at a Christmas-in-July dinner party involving five anonymous dinner guests, including two of the authors.

Main outcome measure: Number of wins achieved by different strategies, with a win defined as securing the larger portion of the cracker.

Results: The previously "guaranteed" strategy for victory, employing a downwards angle towards the puller, failed to differentiate itself from random chance (win rate, 6/15; probability of winning, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.15-0.65). A novel passive-aggressive strategy, in which one individual just holds on without pulling, provided a significant advantage (win rate, 11/12; probability of winning, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00).

Conclusion: The passive-aggressive strategy of failing to pull has a high rate of success at winning Christmas crackers; however, excessive adoption of this approach will result in a complete failure, with no winners at all.

MeSH terms

  • Competitive Behavior
  • Holidays / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Play and Playthings / psychology
  • Wit and Humor as Topic*