Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):623-34. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.63.

Abstract

Aims: This study elaborates on the public's understanding of comparative effectiveness research (CER) or patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), attitudes toward CER/PCOR and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.

Materials & methods: We conducted six focus groups with the general public - three with individuals actively engaged in healthcare decision-making and three with individuals more passive in their approach.

Results: The general public has little knowledge of CER/PCOR, and its perceptions of certain CER/PCOR concepts are inconsistent with those of researchers and policy-makers. Active healthcare consumers value information more than passive consumers and are likely to use evidence in decision-making.

Conclusion: Providers are an important source for disseminating and communicating CER/PCOR evidence to active and passive consumers.

Keywords: activation; active; comparative effectiveness research; consumers; focus groups; passive; public.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research*
  • Decision Making*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Patient Participation
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Public Opinion*