Cost-effectiveness of PET and PET/computed tomography: a systematic review

PET Clin. 2015 Jan;10(1):105-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

The development of clinical diagnostic procedures comprises early-phase and late-phase studies to elucidate diagnostic accuracy and patient outcome. Economic assessments of new diagnostic procedures compared with established work-ups indicate additional cost for 1 additional unit of effectiveness measure by means of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering the replacement of the standard regimen by a new diagnostic procedure. This article discusses economic assessments of PET and PET/computed tomography reported until mid-July 2014. Forty-seven studies on cancer and noncancer indications were identified but, because of the widely varying scope of the analyses, a substantial amount of work remains to be done.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Cost-benefit analysis; Cost-effectiveness; Economics; PET.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / economics
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 / economics*
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Internationality
  • Multimodal Imaging / economics*
  • Neoplasms / economics*
  • Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / economics*
  • Radiopharmaceuticals / economics
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / economics*

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18